[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken

• Subject: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
• From: Doug du Boulay <ddb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 20:21:04 +0900 (JST)

On Friday 17 June 2005 15:14, James Hester wrote:
> In a nutshell:
>
> Both _atom_site_label and _atom_site_aniso_label have the following
> lines in their dictionary definitions:
>
> ...
> _category atom_site
> _list_mandatory  yes
> ...
>
> meaning that they must be included in any list containing items from the
> atom_site category. 

Hi James,

In effect they are "_related_function alternate" s 
for the same definition, as far as I can make out according to 
http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/ddl/definitions/Cdata_list_reference.html
and 
  http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/ddl/definitions/Cdata_category.html

hope it helps.
Doug


_______________________________________________
cif-developers mailing list
cif-developers@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
• Next by Date: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
• Prev by thread: Re: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
• Next by thread: RE: _atom_site_aniso_label is broken
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread