[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- To: Group for discussing encoding and content validation schemes for CIF2 <cif2-encoding@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- From: "Bollinger, John C" <John.Bollinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:01:47 -0500
- Accept-Language: en-US
- acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-Reply-To: <a06240803c8ca416a932e@[192.168.2.104]>
- References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009271801070.86201@epsilon.pair.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009271900080.86201@epsilon.pair.com><AANLkTikudiXBk7orHSAH=JonoeQHeNXVrzvAZmH3Wt94@mail.gmail.com><646265.82162.qm@web87004.mail.ird.yahoo.com><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDE7@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local ><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009281501030.93180@epsilon.pair.com><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDE9@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local ><a06240801c8c840b90dc7@[192.168.2.104]><20100929102536.GB24670@emerald.iucr.org><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009291001300.12237@epsilon.pair.com><20100930084028.GC9485@emerald.iucr.org><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009300540110.389@epsilon.pair.com><629785.55688.qm@web87004.mail.ird.yahoo.com><a06240802c8ca32fa3108@[192.168.2.104]><a06240803c8ca416a932e@[192.168.2.104]>
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:40 AM, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: > James and I had a good e-meeting and came up with the following >revised wording. If anybody objects to this motion, please speak >up now. With apologies, I object. This proposal has exactly the same problem that options (1) and (2) did: it does not define "text file". It is worse in this case, however, because the problem cannot be fixed merely by adding Herbert's definition (or mine). In most environments that definition does not encompass UTF-8 encoded text containing non-ASCII characters, so the recommendation to use UTF-8 implies some other, ill-defined definition. I am quite surprised that the result presented is so different from James's recent compromise proposal, which seemed poised to serve as the basis for a consensus result. Perhaps a viable solution would be to include a definition of "text file" derived from that proposal. Regards, John -- John C. Bollinger, Ph.D. Department of Structural Biology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer _______________________________________________ cif2-encoding mailing list cif2-encoding@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif2-encoding
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion (James Hester)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion (Bollinger, John C)
- References:
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (James Hester)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (Brian McMahon)
- [Cif2-encoding] Skype conference call 8:45 am EDT,Thursday 30 September 2010 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Skype conference call 8:45 am EDT,Thursday 30 September 2010 (Brian McMahon)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Skype conference call 8:45 am EDT,Thursday 30 September 2010 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Skype conference call 8:45 am EDT,Thursday 30 September 2010 (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] Skype conference call 8:45 am EDT,Thursday 30 September 2010 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- Next by Date: Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- Prev by thread: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- Next by thread: Re: [Cif2-encoding] Revised Motion
- Index(es):