Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Preserving CIF1 data sets

  • To: comcifs@iucr.org
  • Subject: Preserving CIF1 data sets
  • From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
  • Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:07:12 -0500
  • In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
  • References: <AANLkTimWpd1kMZDGcTprEhcJw+uQE4_JtgJ4SbtMPVXt@mail.gmail.com><263453.61027.qm@web87016.mail.ird.yahoo.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101070742350.2950@epsilon.pair.com><4D271B81.2050501@rcsb.rutgers.edu><alpine.BSF.2.00.1101071052280.2950@epsilon.pair.com>
Do anyone recall if there ever was a formal decision on

"No changes are required in existing archival data files in order to 
apply domain dictionaries written in DDLm."

as stated in bold type on

http://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/ddl/ddlm

It might help in avoiding further incorrect assumptions to know
if this is or is not a premise for DDLm and CIF2 development.

I for one think this would be a desirable premise.

-- 
=====================================================
  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                  +1-631-244-3035
                  yaya@dowling.edu
=====================================================

Reply to: [list | sender only]