[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Additional update to core dictionary
- To: "Discussion list of the IUCr Committee for the Maintenance of the CIFStandard (COMCIFS)" <comcifs@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: Additional update to core dictionary
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:08:37 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <20110324102821.GB3581@emerald.iucr.org>
- References: <20110324102821.GB3581@emerald.iucr.org>
I see no problem with Brian adding in _journal_paper_doi as described below. James. On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Brian McMahon <bm@iucr.org> wrote: > Colleagues > > Assuming James also approves the recent "fast-track" changes, I'll > be happy to work on releasing quickly a new minor upgrade version > of the core CIF dictionary. > > With your indulgence, I would like to take the opportunity to add > at the same time > _journal_paper_doi > as a new member of the JOURNAL category, expressing the digital > object identifier (DOI) assigned to the article published from > the data in the current CIF, e.g. > _journal_paper_doi '10.1107/S010876739101067X' > > Traditionally, these _journal_ items have been taken to be in > the gift of the IUCr journals staff, and have not gone through > the usual formal review process. They are not individually > defined in the core dictionary, though perhaps they should be. > > I would not expect any particular concern over the proposed new > item; it's just another piece of bibliographic housekeeping. > However, there is the possibility of creating new data names to > record DOIs for other associated publications or data sets, > now that it is starting to become common practice to register such > identifiers for data sets. We have considered this possibility > carefully in the Acta office, and have come to the conclusion that > such definitions would be premature. There is as yet no established > code of practice for assigning DOIs to data sets in a way that > records their relationship to other data sets or publications. > CrossRef, the body that has managed DOIs centrally for the > publishing industry, is now partnered by DataCite, which seeks > to perform the same role for research data sets. We feel that it > would be best to track any protocols these bodies establish for > cross-linking before seeking to emulate them with suitable > CIF data names. > > On the other hand, if any of you feel differently about this, > or have specific data names that you wish to suggest, please > feel free to do so. > > Best wishes > Brian > _______________________________________________ > comcifs mailing list > comcifs@iucr.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/comcifs > -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907 F +61 (02) 9717 3145 M +61 (04) 0249 4148
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Additional update to core dictionary (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- References:
- Additional update to core dictionary (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: Additional update to core dictionary
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Items for fast track COMCIFS approval
- Prev by thread: Additional update to core dictionary
- Next by thread: Re: Additional update to core dictionary
- Index(es):