[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:23:28 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <279aad2a0912211800r5a466fb8tf7e07aa1b683e848@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <279aad2a0912201941p7f0c3a18idd4eb6c99f41ace6@mail.gmail.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.0912210539280.95122@epsilon.pair.com><a06240800c75528f8ca61@192.168.2.104><279aad2a0912211800r5a466fb8tf7e07aa1b683e848@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:00 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:
Actually, not agreed. The parser would assign values to the individual elements, so there is no need for any implicit definitions of each array element.
See responses below:On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Herbert J. Bernstein <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com> wrote:
Proposals related to special characters in CIF2 tags:
1. implicitly defined element tags
1.1. For any CIF 2 tag that defines an array or a list the appearance
of the array or list definition in the dictionary would implicitly
also define tags for each of the array or list elements using the
square bracket notation.
Agreed. There is potential for misunderstanding here which I will address in a separate reply.
Actually, not agreed. The parser would assign values to the individual elements, so there is no need for any implicit definitions of each array element.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up? (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up? (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up? (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF2 Syntax all wrapped up?
- Index(es):