[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Are empty lists/tables valid?
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Are empty lists/tables valid?
- From: Nick Spadaccini <nick@csse.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:30:17 +0800
- Authentication-Results: postfix;
- In-Reply-To: <4B22A921.8060007@niehs.nih.gov>
Going back a long way. This was not followed up as far as I can see. I don't think it has been discussed, but don't see why we would not allow it. It makes more sense within dREL where you are effectively invoking the container constructor, but if a user wants to explicitly state a data item has no value then why not? On 12/12/09 4:18 AM, "Joe Krahn" <krahn@niehs.nih.gov> wrote: > Has it been discussed whether an empty list or table is valid? That > should added to the CIF2 spec. > > Thanks, > Joe > _______________________________________________ > ddlm-group mailing list > ddlm-group@iucr.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group cheers Nick -------------------------------- Associate Professor N. Spadaccini, PhD School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia t: +61 (0)8 6488 3452 35 Stirling Highway f: +61 (0)8 6488 1089 CRAWLEY, Perth, WA 6009 AUSTRALIA w3: www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~nick MBDP M002 CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G e: Nick.Spadaccini@uwa.edu.au _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Are empty lists/tables valid? (Joe Krahn)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Case sensitivity
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Comments and folding within lists and tables
- Prev by thread: [ddlm-group] Are empty lists/tables valid?
- Next by thread: [ddlm-group] Data-name character restrictions - one last time
- Index(es):