[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 07:14:33 -0500 (EST)
- In-Reply-To: <20100301103520.GA25391@emerald.iucr.org>
- References: <20100301103520.GA25391@emerald.iucr.org>
While there may be refinements, corrections and additions to this document, I believe it fairly represents the major decisions made over the past year, and suggest we approve it as is, ask the community for comments over a limited period of time, and move forward with implementation promptly. -=- Herbert ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 yaya@dowling.edu ===================================================== On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Brian McMahon wrote: > With apologies to Nick for the delay, I have now posted the latest > draft of the revised CIF specification change document (dated 18 February > 2010) at > http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/40775/syntaxchangesproposed20100218.pdf > > Nick has drawn my attention to the approach taken in this draft that > many of the restrictions required to CIF2 data files and names that > have been previously discussed on this list are a requirement of the > DDLm application of CIF2. > > Hence this document is liberal with respect to what you can have. It > allows for a family of CIF2 applications that imposes minimal name > restrictions, *but such applications cannot be handled in a DDLm, dREL > framework*. > > The implication is that if, for example, IUCr journals or other > stakeholders wished to take full advantage of DDLm/dREL (which, after > all, is the primary motivation for this line of development), they > would impose the additional necessary naming restrictions to ensure > that only DDLm/dREL-compliant CIFs were handled in their normal > workflow. > > Regards > Brian > _________________________________________________________________________ > Brian McMahon tel: +44 1244 342878 > Research and Development Officer fax: +44 1244 314888 > International Union of Crystallography e-mail: bm@iucr.org > 5 Abbey Square, Chester CH1 2HU, England > _______________________________________________ > ddlm-group mailing list > ddlm-group@iucr.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group > _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes (Brian McMahon)
- Prev by Date: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Prev by thread: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Latest summary of proposed CIF syntax changes
- Index(es):