[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:52:08 +1100
Dear DDLm group, The encoding group that was split off this group and tasked with developing a mutually satisfactory approach to encodings in CIF2 has now produced an updated draft of the CIF2 'changes' document. Brian has posted this on the IUCr website at http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/41911/cif2_syntax_changes_jrh20101005.pdf The changes relative to the July draft are in section 2 describing the character set, and some additional text in section 1. Once we resolve the string concatenation operator issue, I think we are in good shape to take CIF2 to COMCIFS for approval. I would once again urge anybody with any outstanding issues regarding DDLm or dREL to bring those issues up as soon as possible. James. -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907 F +61 (02) 9717 3145 M +61 (04) 0249 4148 _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] String concatenation operator in CIF2. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings. .
- Index(es):