[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:26:30 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikDLKwjy6ZqkyJNcenVi14AWa4mYCNma85YtV2A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTikDLKwjy6ZqkyJNcenVi14AWa4mYCNma85YtV2A@mail.gmail.com>
Aye. -- Herbert
=====================================================
Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
+1-631-244-3035
yaya@dowling.edu
=====================================================
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, James Hester wrote:
> Dear DDLm group members,
>
> It appears that we have exhausted the discussion on the pros and cons of a
> concatenation operator. I'd therefore like to call for a vote on the
> following:
>
> "That a datavalue concatenation operator be added to the CIF2 syntax. The
> concatenation operator shall be a single underscore, placed between the two
> datavalues to be concatenated and separated from each of them by
> whitespace. The concatenation operator may only be used to concatenate
> delimited datavalues."
>
> James.
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Prev by thread: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
- Index(es):