[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(1) In a dictionary, they structurally mirror the definition hierarchy, that is, they contain no additional information. There is no scoping function given that the dREL definitions are able to refer to any dataname in any save frame.
(2) In a data file, there appears to be no difference between using nested save frames as compared to a simple sequence of save frames. The save frame references introduced in the STAR2 paper require all save frame names to be unique within a datablock, regardless of nesting.
James.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 11:30:09 +1000
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C8uVtHJYKALMVM5F4gzpg+5IpY4mZACMoK0g8ws9exI=;b=FwtvcPwnMJNySGS3oITY5b23/36TeuGrwcwR6970fF2aWeDt1tf+ohXrsQZ3aA0lXeJtIgkM0plMbvMZF/TG601jyrDu4dV9LToML6H40TPj0rTbr58hqC0UV/gzzTyIEMjkagfpculpNdIvPAoWb451MQWnSj86Z+kqLoOpgpRgGKjPPi0VdBUo7DBwlwH2eEoXenzhkSixoLXk09nMC4+8LXfd+/5lSa0+C5TscmrfbMf2+cjeH6p1ru2e1WX/dIVh7kA8twjJgMxVE7uDofytbujE0DI3PRk2iIgYIjsDhgdmQMXiIZhq0YEutjYmJa6xIMbxYJWbgTJOo2ONww==
- In-Reply-To: <8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54756EB8E8D8@11.stjude.org>
- References: <CAM+dB2eWm0m2qYTB1O7L2St-RUOJM5FRimFCozhwqWLEC0UR-Q@mail.gmail.com><CAM+dB2eR1cHPGFUyEYbdiTVCSDpGYfpSZa_MhfAGs+7FBDfUaQ@mail.gmail.com><53F69074.8040000@rcsb.rutgers.edu><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA54756EB8E8D8@11.stjude.org>
Dear DDLm group:
My understanding of nested save frames is as follows:In both cases it seems that nested save frames are an organisational tool only.
So I don't believe that we lose anything by dropping nested save frames.James.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Bollinger, John C <John.Bollinger@stjude.org> wrote:
Hi John,
The EBNF James distributed does require save frames to be named, as in previous versions of CIF. Here is the relevant production:
save-heading = save-token, container-name;
Regards,
John
--
John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.
Computing and X-Ray Scientist
Department of Structural Biology
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
John.Bollinger@StJude.org
(901) 595-3166 [office]
www.stjude.org
Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
-----Original Message-----
From: ddlm-group-bounces@iucr.org [mailto:ddlm-group-bounces@iucr.org] On Behalf Of John Westbrook
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:36 PM
To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries
Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2. .
Hi James,
I would prefer that there be no self nesting of either save or data sections and that save sections should be named.
Regards,
John
On 8/21/14, 8:26 PM, James Hester wrote:
> Dear DDLm group,
>
> John Bollinger has reminded by of a further change: nested save
> frames, which were introduced in the STAR2 and DDLm papers, are
> included in the EBNF. CIF1.1 only envisioned a single level of save frames, and only in dictionary files. Absent a decision by this group or COMCIFS, the restriction of save frames to dictionary files (nested or otherwise) would continue.
>
> James.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:33 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com <mailto:jamesrhester@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dear DDLm group,
>
> John Bollinger and myself have put our heads together and produced an ISO 14977 EBNF specification of CIF2.0 syntax. We were
> working from the 10 August 2011 "CIF Changes" document agreed by this group and approved in Madrid, available in the archives of
> this list at http://www.iucr.org/__data/iucr/lists/ddlm-group/pdf00001.pdf, with the following change:
>
> (1) triple-quoted strings were returned to the specification as agreed in Montreal, in the form contained in the draft posted at
>
> http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/59420/cif2_syntax_chan
> ges-jcb20110728.pdf
>
> Please study the attached EBNF (plain text format) and advise of any errors, omissions or ambiguities. Note that EBNF is
> clearly not the best format for machine-generation of parsers, but it should be sufficiently precise and understandable to serve
> as a foundation document for CIF2.
>
> For those, such as myself, who have not seen the ENBF '-' operator before, the meaning of "A-B" is: all character sequences
> satisfying A, except those that satisfy B.
>
> My intention is to start producing documentation for CIF2 on the basis of this EBNF, so your earliest comments would be most
> appreciated.
>
> all the best,
> James.
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%209907>
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%203145>
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
>
>
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> ddlm-group@iucr.org
> http://mailman.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>
--
John Westbrook, Ph.D.
RCSB, Protein Data Bank
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
174 Frelinghuysen Rd
Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087
e-mail: jwest@rcsb.rutgers.edu
Ph: (848) 445-4290 Fax: (732) 445-4320
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://mailman.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Consultation Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/consultationdisclaimer
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://mailman.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2 (John Westbrook)
- References:
- [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2 (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2 (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2 (John Westbrook)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2 (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Draft EBNF for CIF2
- Index(es):