[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
best wishes,
James.
--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[ddlm-group] Character sets in DDLm attribute dictionary
- To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: [ddlm-group] Character sets in DDLm attribute dictionary
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:54:11 +1000
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=TcA7744DX+IG/Va4XWDBimh/tei532BVLaF2p/jsnuA=;b=Y6zNx0BDJbZrtGu67R0wVYzhNVVB14vf9YuuX7FSkYU7+QBkxhkXCG4omgs0fk5iMW0xEu9wSsgY1nA8GeR4PIcHRpMQUqTQnNCdWfBGNnluKlN2e/ZNi8Lfaz/QI6lsM7ocvgdmsN38TmwmOkvcqbm4ugqZTrWMnV28VEslUt6d5PQN15XqeROYQ+Njf5g0PQMHHr7RvsY2/df20ebhcMP5leV3xdf+/q62iP0VRF3yMu2n1d7FBEfXMEaK9Cd0dtbZoGJfBZkmO35okpFrThLCsDEFoW0s3G+3MnAppPRSZ6xweIllgkfQ/yDKMU1mUSgcBnurdr4C1qmkbpfZLA==
Dear DDLm group,
The current ddl.dic specifies in several places that characters are drawn from the STAR character set. I suggest that we change this to the CIF2 character set and explicitly reference this characterset somewhere in ddl.dic. Otherwise we are permitting characters in our data values and names that are not expressible in CIF2 files. Unless I hear objections from this group, I'll make this change.--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Character sets in DDLm attribute dictionary (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: [ddlm-group] Making _audit.schema dictionaries more orthogonal to_audit.formalism dictionaries
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Character sets in DDLm attribute dictionary
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Dictionary versioning
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Character sets in DDLm attribute dictionary
- Index(es):