Dear Herbert, Just tried it and it seems to work on this system too. Best, Jon Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: > Dear Jon, > > I think I found the g95 problem. Please try changing line 8 of > test_fcb_read_image.m4 to read > > INTEGER,PARAMETER:: FCB_BYTES_IN_REC=4096 > > instead of > > INTEGER,PARAMETER:: FCB_BYTES_IN_REC=131072 > > This will make the blocks for reads commensurate with the padding > in the data files. It appears that g95 differs from the other > f90 systems we have tried in its handling of a short record. > I will investigate further, but this changes seems to allow all tests > to run successfully, at least on my system. > > Regards, > Herbert _______________________________________________ imgcif-l mailing list imgcif-l@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/imgcif-l
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster