On Jun 20, 10:20am, Peter Keller wrote: > > Dear all, > > Unfortunately, constructions such as: > > > save_DATA_BLOCK > > _category.description > ; > Attributes defining the characteristics of a data block. > ; > _category.id data_block > > > mean that the DDL is no longer STAR conformant (!) - recall that in the > STAR specification (Hall and Spadaccini, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. vol > 34, p505-508, 1994) we have the definition: > > <data_heading> ::= data_<non_blank_char>+ However the definition of <data> is the following: <data> ::= <data_name> <data_value> | <data_loop> I interpret this to mean that an instance of data must include both a data name and either a data value or data loop. The definition for data values do not include the possibility for another instance of a data header. I had also interpreted that in section 10a of J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 34, p508 Privileged Constructs, that the restriction in the use of data_, loop_, global_, etc. applied to the specification of data items (ie. the data name not the data value). At any rate, thanks for pointing out this problem. I am putting a version of the dictionary on the server that has quoting that you indicate will allow the DDL to survive the STARbase test. Regards... John -- **************************************************************************** * John Westbrook Ph: (908) 445-5156 * * Department of Chemistry Fax: (908) 445-5958 * * Rutgers University * * PO Box 939 e-mail: jwest@rutchem.rutgers.edu * * Piscataway, NJ 08855-0939 * ****************************************************************************