Herb Bernstein writes: > For the following four items, I can't seem to find an explicit > declaration of the item.category_id. For the third one, I cannot > make the match even by implicit use of the appropriate save-frame > name, since the item name does not match the block name. For the > others, there is such a match, and it seems that the DDL2.1.0 > rules allow the item.category_id to be derived implicitly, but > I would suggest that for clarity and consistency that the > item.category_id be given explicitly. > > _chem_link.type_comp_1 > _chem_link.type_comp_2 + Added _item.name loop and parent-child tree to _chem_comp.type > _phasing_mir_der.set_id <--- defined in _phasing_mir_der.der_set_id + Fixed _item.name for _phasing_mir_der.der_set_id > _phasing_mir_der_refln.set_id + Added _phasing_mir_der_refln.set_id to _item.name loop and parent-child tree of _phasing_set.id > Here are two cases the program found where a block name fails to > match any of the item names within it (including the case above) > > ciftbx warning: cifdic.m95 save__phasing_mir_der.der_set_id line: 17247 > No name in the block matches the block name > ciftbx warning: cifdic.m95 save__phasing_mir_der.native_set_id line: 17299 > No name in the block matches the block name + Fixed _item.name for _phasing_mir_der.der_set_id + Fixed _item.name for _phasing_mir_der.native_set_id Paula ******************************************************************************** Dr. Paula M. D. Fitzgerald ______________ voice and FAX: (908) 594-5510 Merck Research Laboratories ______________ email: paula_fitzgerald@merck.com P.O. Box 2000, Ry50-105 ______________ or bean@merck.com Rahway, NJ 07065 USA (for express mail use 126 E. Lincoln Ave. instead of P. O. Box 2000) ********************************************************************************