Frances Bernstein writes: > I was looking at database information in mmCIF and found the following typo > and inconsistency: > > 1. DATEBASE_NEW should be DATABASE_NEW in the following: > > ; Data items in the DATABASE category have been supercedes by > data items in the DATEBASE_NEW category. They are included > here only for compliance with older files. > > 2. I then realized that DATABASE_NEW is used in text and in the list of > changes at the end but the items appear to have database_2 as part of > their names rather than database_new. This needs to be made consistent > with one name or the other through the document. How right you are - and I thought I had caught all of these before. I have fixed this, and the only occurrence of DATABASE_NEW is now in the audit trail, where logically it does belong. Paula ******************************************************************************** Dr. Paula M. D. Fitzgerald ______________ voice and FAX: (908) 594-5510 Merck Research Laboratories ______________ email: paula_fitzgerald@merck.com P.O. Box 2000, Ry50-105 ______________ or bean@merck.com Rahway, NJ 07065 USA (for express mail use 126 E. Lincoln Ave. instead of P. O. Box 2000) ********************************************************************************