[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- To: Group for discussing encoding and content validation schemes for CIF2 <cif2-encoding@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 22:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
- In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=hmKNFMgaeMqt69=sG6dOmxZRUrffB1khjF+mZ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTi=hmKNFMgaeMqt69=sG6dOmxZRUrffB1khjF+mZ@mail.gmail.com>
Please characterize my proposal as 'as for CIF1 proposal with UTF8 in place of ASCII' ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 yaya@dowling.edu ===================================================== On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, James Hester wrote: > Dear CIF2 encoding participants, > > As Herbert has indicated, we are starting to run out of time for > resolution of the encoding issue. I believe that we have now explored > the various proposals sufficiently to all have a good understanding of > the consequences and advantages of each approach. So, after a round > of final comments, I propose that we vote on the general scheme that > we recommend. We can then flesh out the details of the particular > scheme that we have settled on, and take this completed proposal to > the DDLm group for their approval, following which we will present the > entire CIF2 syntax document to COMCIFS for a formal vote. > > The proposals that I believe are still on the table are: > > 1. Herbert's 'as for CIF1 proposal' recently posted here and to COMCIFS. > 2. Herbert's 'as for CIF1 proposal', together with Brian's proposal > (if you agree that they are compatible) > 2. UTF8-only as in the original draft > 3. UTF8 + UTF16 > 4. UTF8, UTF16 + "local" > > I have not included the hashcode proposal as I believe it no longer > has any supporters. > > We would need to conduct a preferential vote. I stress that this is > purely to determine the recommendation of this working group, and is > not in any way binding on COMCIFS. > > James. > -- > T +61 (02) 9717 9907 > F +61 (02) 9717 3145 > M +61 (04) 0249 4148 > _______________________________________________ > cif2-encoding mailing list > cif2-encoding@iucr.org > http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif2-encoding > _______________________________________________ cif2-encoding mailing list cif2-encoding@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif2-encoding
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (James Hester)
- References:
- [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- Next by Date: Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- Prev by thread: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- Next by thread: Re: [Cif2-encoding] How we wrap this up
- Index(es):