[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ddlm-group] Moving on to DDLm discussion

• To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
• Subject: [ddlm-group] Moving on to DDLm discussion
• From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:50:00 +1100

Dear DDLm-ers,

Now is the time to discuss the DDLm specification (the current draft
is at http://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/ddl/ddlm).  In addition to the
issues raised by David, there were some proposals during the syntax
discussion to impose ordering on loop columns and rows that we
deferred.  I invite proponents of those proposals to put them up now
for discussion (in a separate thread).

If there are some other ideas for DDLm attributes or behaviour, let's hear them!

James.
-- 
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Finalizing DDLm
• Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Finalizing DDLm
• Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Feedback on draft CIF2 specification fromJohn Bollinger
• Next by thread: [ddlm-group] Finalizing DDLm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread