[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- From: "Bollinger, John C" <John.Bollinger@STJUDE.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:39:45 -0500
- Accept-Language: en-US
- acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-Reply-To: <295878.84365.qm@web87008.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
- References: <4C471374.6000100@mcmaster.ca><alpine.BSF.2.00.1007211307460.37813@epsilon.pair.com><AANLkTinyxmyKFOt=A6Cpdq=8LVsSR4+Js9xDOG+JEF--@mail.gmail.com><AANLkTimTab=b9u6nsUjd6UitRni-OgMTJNZYt1EMjrhE@mail.gmail.com><a06240804c8ca43f92cc2@[192.168.2.104]><295878.84365.qm@web87008.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:18 AM, SIMON WESTRIP wrote: >First thought is how does this work in loops? > >loop_ _item >'abc' + 'def' One specific (but synthetic) example I was thinking of was along the same lines: loop_ _amino_acid.code _amino_acid.optical_rotation_direction 'ALA' + 'ARG' + 'LEU' - >But I need to check whether + is one of the characters that is not allowed to start a >non-delimited string... It is not. Those are " ' _ $ [ { If the proposal is adopted then adding + to that list would reduce the added complications for parsing. That would be incompatible with using the optional leading + with numeric values, however. >Otherwise I see no reason not to explore this. I see no reason at all not to explore it. Notwithstanding the above, I have not yet formed an opinion on this question. Regards, John -- John C. Bollinger, Ph.D. Department of Structural Biology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Nick Spadaccini)
- References:
- [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (David Brown)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .
- Index(es):