[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ddlm-group] Result of concatenation operator vote

• To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
• Subject: [ddlm-group] Result of concatenation operator vote
• From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
• Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:00:35 +1100

My count is 2 in favour, 4 against, with Simon (whose vote doesn't appear to have come in) potentially making that 3 in favour and 4 against.  These are not entirely convincing numbers for either side. However, although the proponents of the concatenation operator are free to address COMCIFS on this question, a replay of this vote within COMCIFS would lead to at least 3 opposed and at least one in favour, with Nick's opposition making it (at best) a 4-2 vote against.  So, I suggest that at this point we delay any further consideration of concatenation until COMCIFS has approved CIF2.

In a subsequent email I will therefore put the current CIF2 spec to a DDLm group vote, and assuming it passes will present it to COMCIFS for final approval.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148

_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ddlm-group] Result of concatenation operator vote (Herbert J. Bernstein)

• Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• Next by Date: [ddlm-group] Vote on accepting CIF2 draft document
• Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on accepting CIF2 draft document
• Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Result of concatenation operator vote
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread