Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] DDLm aliases (subject changed). .. .. .

One problem with treating the xref as the ensemble, is that with DDLm,
we are moving into having multiple dictionaries for one ensemble, and
even now, with DDL2, we are in the same state with imgCIF, in which
the ensemble spans both the imgCIF and mmCIF dictionaries.

Another problem is that, again with the move to DDLm, one dictionary
can be home to multiple ensembles.

That being said, when you have a unitary case, as with the DDL1 core
or the DDL2 mmCIF dictionary, in which the dictionary is an ensemble
and the ensemble is that same dictionary, citing just the relevant
xref, rather than the ensemble will suffice.



At 11:03 AM -0600 1/27/11, Bollinger, John C wrote:
>On Thursday, January 27, 2011 6:53 AM, John Westbrook wrote:
>
>>I am trying to understand the mapping of the proposed items to a simple
>>example from the mmCIF dictionary.   Could you provide an example using
>>the proposed DDL for how the following alias would be represented.
>>
>>save__geom.details
>>      _item_description.description
>>;              A description of geometry not covered by the
>>                 existing data names in the GEOM categories, such as
>>                 least-squares planes.
>>;
>>      _item.name                  '_geom.details'
>>      _item.category_id             geom
>>      _item.mandatory_code          no
>>      _item_aliases.alias_name    '_geom_special_details'
>>      _item_aliases.dictionary      cif_core.dic
>>      _item_aliases.version         2.0.1
>>      _item_type.code               text
>>       save_
>
>
>So, it looks like despite converging on an agreed form for the DDLm 
>changes we have been discussing, Herbert and I may still have 
>divergent visions for their use.  As far as I intend, and even as I 
>interpret the proposed formal changes, "ensembles" are distinct from 
>and on top of aliases.  You can have aliases without ensembles, but 
>not ensembles without aliases.  As such, this is how I think the 
>above alias, plus an alias to the DDL2 mmCIF definition, would be 
>modeled in a DDLm dictionary:
>
>save_geom.details
>[...]
>loop_
>     _alias.definition_id
>     _alias.xref_code
>     _alias.deprecated
>     '_geom_special_details' core  no
>     '_geom.details'         mmCIF no
>[...]
>save_
>
>
>That references items in the existing, dictionary-wide 
>dictionary_xref category:
>
>loop_
>     _dictionary_xref.code
>     _dictionary_xref.name
>     _dictionary_xref.date
>     _dictionary_xref.format
>     _dictionary_xref.uri
>     core   cif_core.dic  '29-Jun-2010'  DDL1 
>ftp://ftp.iucr.org/pub/cif_core.dic
>     mmCIF  cif_mm.dic    '27-Jun-2005'  DDL2 
>ftp://ftp.iucr.org/pub/cif_mm.dic
>
>
>Currently _dictionary_xref.format (values 'DDL1' and 'DDL2' above) 
>is defined as having type 'Text', meaning that it is not intended to 
>be machine-interpretable.  It is an open question whether that item 
>should be redefined to be a 'Code' drawing on a controlled 
>vocabulary of format codes.
>
>You will also note that in the most recent version of the proposal 
>there is no analog of _item_alias.version.  An earlier version of 
>the proposal did contain such an analog (_alias.dictionary_version), 
>and anyone who thinks it important to have that is welcome to make a 
>case for reintroducing it.  I would not oppose such a move.
>
>Anyway, having defined aliases as shown above, a dictionary author 
>might choose to associate them with one or more ensembles as Herbert 
>demonstrated.  The meaning of any particular ensemble can be 
>dictionary-specific, but the proposal on the table presumes some 
>kind of official set of particular ensemble IDs with centrally 
>defined meaning.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>John
>
>--
>John C. Bollinger, Ph.D.
>Department of Structural Biology
>St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Email Disclaimer:  www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
>
>_______________________________________________
>ddlm-group mailing list
>ddlm-group@iucr.org
>http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group


-- 
=====================================================
  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                  +1-631-244-3035
                  yaya@dowling.edu
=====================================================
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.

Useful links