[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
John R Helliwell
Professor of Structural Chemistry, The University of Manchester;
Joint Appointee with CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory;
Editor-in-Chief Acta Crystallographica published by IUCr.
Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- To: Howard Flack <[email protected]>,Sydney Hall <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- From: john richard helliwell <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: [email protected], Ulrich Mueller <[email protected]>,Mois Aroyo <[email protected]>,"John R.Helliwell" <[email protected]>,Helen Berman <[email protected]>,Nicola Ashcroft <[email protected]>,Michael Glazer <[email protected]>,Howard Einspahr <[email protected]>, Brian McMahon <[email protected]>
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f3xmOrZH/RemepfCHGVHdKylO6wPjrV08HUeNiSerBdT2PNmV0LzPH4u0TMUdIUoTcXHMEdhYnDOthQzY664m+cEDxWwK8GbL0jhUQCUxdy/xnm4kEWIdmyBOmlh1xUa2y0ZYUsUHkdGmIl0aqOav18bVwoGfPkaSUlKysSAofo= ;
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Dear Syd,
I acknowledge safe receipt of your draft recommendations and Howard's elaborations.
Whilst I agree obviously with International Tables being online as essential, and urgently needed, I find myself struggling to agree with the implications of the 'unanimous view....that use of print-on-paper will rapidly decline in the next decade.'
specifically this begs the question ;- decline to zero?
The suggestion I offer then is that perhaps short print versions should be allowed for in IUCr's planning of the various IT titles along the lines of the teaching edition of Volume A. This would retain flexibility and allow the non-tabular data type of content to be printed (but with examples of tabular data still included) eg in the way that Howard has suggested ie according to demand.
Flexibility of approach is required I believe because I think there is a very significant risk in the recommendations of assuming that the paperless office will be 95% of researchers' behaviours in a very short timescale. I may be old fashioned but my office is definitely not paperless yet [and with not much sign of abatement either]. Rather the experience I have is a wider range of information availablities but where paper is definitely still very much an option one uses.
Greetings to all,
John
> though 1(c)
> may be seen as a bit too prescriptive.
Instead how about:
The maintenance of print-on-paper volumes of IT is a matter of market
demand. A switch from bulk lithograph printing to digital printing to
print-on-demand will enable smaller numbers of volumes to be printed and
warehoused, but with an increased unit production cost and selling
price. Timely decisions will need to made on this matter.
John R Helliwell
Professor of Structural Chemistry, The University of Manchester;
Joint Appointee with CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory;
Editor-in-Chief Acta Crystallographica published by IUCr.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Howard Flack)
- References:
- Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2 (Howard Flack)
- Prev by Date: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- Next by Date: RE : DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- Prev by thread: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- Next by thread: Re: DRAFT recommendations v1.2
- Index(es):

