[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
--
[Send comment to list owner]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 1: could detector and 2 theta offsetbe looped together in pd_calib?
- To: pddmg@iucr.org
- Subject: Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 1: could detector and 2 theta offsetbe looped together in pd_calib?
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 19:16:27 +1100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=Klulq1S6WS5tEJZ4+YTBdm5kxAPIZCObnckZBpQU+qQ=;b=coluFlWlT6wjF3MaE5j0meF4NOfM2/XjJaXLLG7dgWrtm5+UIpNqh+vgF03US206ioxJb5ahlRL/csq2HlF4/wZ54Pl+GMx40LJtnkkIYJYiWHRfZ23mKzO7MMGtYhsFXc/xN4j9Znv+e5C4+Ol4OHcB3zNlsIitIuE4gANY6KvziyCrSNmdVTPWhGA9aPmxR2uTaVgy9X1+l5jk+X2QeQ9tXUYMWjsvNoJ8shYcj923mvAE+FSH4Q97z6vTMwD1JDRFVLOiKkzA86VyKvD2GFrj//lkOvFvdbEWSHuRdgblrWn+AUFgVU9R4qeXGHWogcXDb03C2qp0erTc6K/iQA==
- In-Reply-To: <CAM+dB2e5Od1Q6rEF3Z7_YewWhq9opC81Xc+=qSjZqiArJ_mm=Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <05D8B974-6AAF-4525-BED8-8AC867FF548F@anl.gov><8DD0B0B9-4599-4A32-B726-BC6B2D413364@anl.gov><CAM+dB2e5Od1Q6rEF3Z7_YewWhq9opC81Xc+=qSjZqiArJ_mm=Q@mail.gmail.com>
The latest version available on github (HTML: http://comcifs.github.io/cif_pow.dic.html, raw text https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/blob/cif2-conversion/cif_pow.dic) implements this change (optionally including a detector_id in the 2 theta offset loop). I will present this dictionar to COMCIFS next week for a 3-week review unless I hear otherwise from this group.
James.On 3 November 2016 at 16:59, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:
James.What I suggest we then do is add a pd_calib_offset.detector_id dataname for the situations in which there is a separate offset per detector. This dataname would take a default value in the case of a single detector and so could be left out of the _pd_calib_offset loop in that case.(Another missed message from Brian below)The situation with Brian's single Huber seems to be described well with a 'correction against 2 theta' table using _pd_calib_offset_* (http://comcifs.github.io/cif_pow.dic.html#PD_CALIB_OFFSET ). But you have reminded me that our PD neutron detector here consists of 128 tubes, all of which have their own 2 theta offset correction. This is all absorbed during the data reduction but would be nice to capture nevertheless in the output pdCIF file. On 3 November 2016 at 16:15, Toby, Brian H. <toby@anl.gov> wrote:one more, from yesterday
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brian Toby <toby@anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 1: could detector and 2 theta offset be looped together in pd_calib?
Date: November 1, 2016 at 10:52:20 AM CDT
To: Distribution list of the IUCr COMCIFS Powder Diffraction Dictionary Maintenance Group <pddmg@iucr.org>
I put this aside for more thought originally, but I am not sure if that moment will arrive, so let me provide a few (perhaps random) comments.
One concern here is that it is common with strip and area detectors that one often collects data at different two-theta settings due to gaps in the arrays. I will skip the self-citation, but I have worked on a detector where the CCD readout is synchronized to the two-theta sweep. One would probably not try to handle raw data from that in pdCIF, but I could certainly imagine having Mythen data collected at several different 2theta settings. I guess a separate block for each could be a solution, if we so choose.Â
I think that I also considered the case where the 2-theta offset could vary with 2theta. At 11-BM we do apply corrections as a function of 2-theta since we can see that the Huber deviates from ideal.Â
Brian
On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:28 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:
There having been no response to this, I will assume that there is limited to no demand for a multi-detector+multi-offset capability and leave the current powCIF draft as is.James.
______________________________
On 24 October 2016 at 11:23, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>  wrote:
In DDL1, items in the pd_calib category can vary by detector ("loops may be used for calibration information that differs by detector channel"). Similarly, 2theta offset values can be looped where the offset varies by point. While this is fine, it is not clear if we wish the pd dictionary to cover a situation where both detector and 2 theta offset vary, that is, for each detector in a multi-detector setup the 2 theta offset can take multiple values for different points collected by that detector. Has anyone encountered such a situation?
If the situation is rare, but conceivable, we can create a separate 'extension dictionary' which covers this case, but mainstream software is protected from misinterpreting loops (this is a new feature).
James.
--Â
_________________
pdDMG mailing list
pdDMG@iucr.org
http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg
************************************************************ ******** Brian H. Toby, Ph.D.                   office: 630-252-5488Advanced Photon Source Chief Computational ScientistSenior Physicist/Computational X-ray Science Group Leader9700 S. Cass Ave, Bldg. 401/B4192         cell: 630-327-8426   ÂArgonne National Laboratory    ÂArgonne, IL 60439-4856      e-mail: brian dot toby at anl dot govÂ************************************************************ ******** "We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders... We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories... All this we can do. All this we will do."
************************************************************ ******** Brian H. Toby, Ph.D.                   office: 630-252-5488Advanced Photon Source Chief Computational ScientistSenior Physicist/Computational X-ray Science Group Leader9700 S. Cass Ave, Bldg. 401/B4192         cell: 630-327-8426   ÂArgonne National Laboratory    ÂArgonne, IL 60439-4856      e-mail: brian dot toby at anl dot govÂ************************************************************ ******** "We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology's wonders... We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories... All this we can do. All this we will do."
--
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ pdDMG mailing list pdDMG@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pddmg
[Send comment to list owner]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- References:
- Prev by Date: [pdDMG] Revised powder dictionaries for multiple phases
- Next by Date: [pdDMG] A definition for F_meas_squared for powder data
- Prev by thread: Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 1: could detector and 2 theta offsetbe looped together in pd_calib?
- Next by thread: Re: [pdDMG] DDLm pdCIF Issue 3: pd_refln should not add phase_id tothe main dictionary REFLN category
- Index(es):