Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


  • Subject: Re: The CIF BNF
  • From: Brian McMahon <bm@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:29:42 +0100 (BST)

The version you posted differs from the one I previewed in its additional
annotations. I want to (1) flag an error and (2) raise a question.

(1) CIF datanames now have no formal length restriction (see
    http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/cif/cif_core/diff2.0-1.0.html#syn) - but
    they still have to fit within a line of text.

(2) When writing vcif, I took the "80-character limit" to be in spirit
    independent of platform and thus the number of characters before the
    <newline> byte sequence. I would still favour that interpretation
    (otherwise existing CIFs will break, and to guard against operating
    systems that invoke even more varied text record delimiting systems).

What do others think about (2)? 


Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.