Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Powder CIF Proposals

  • Subject: Re: Powder CIF Proposals
  • From: "ROBIN SHIRLEY (USER)" <R.Shirley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 18:29:43 +0100 (BST)

Further to my posting of Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:48:08 GMT:

> But in response to people's feedback this became elaborated into a 
> sequence of three separate items (which could be looped if 
> necessary):
>   M (the numerical value)
>   FOM (the generic type, left as quoted text)
>   "program", or as I now prefer, "source" (another piece of quoted  
>   text, which for example summarises the program version or other  
>   source of the specific algorithm used)
> e.g.
> _pd_index_merit_M          21.7
> _pd_index_merit_FOM        'M20'
> _pd_index_merit_source     'ITO12'

Re-reading this, I realise that the terms _M and _FOM are not very
transparent.  It might be preferable to substitute_value and _type.

Thus the example would become:

 _pd_index_merit_value      21.7
 _pd_index_merit_type       'M20'
 _pd_index_merit_source     'ITO12'

which is, I think, rather clearer.

Robin Shirley

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.