Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Question: representation of uncertainties in scientific notation

  • Subject: Question: representation of uncertainties in scientific notation
  • From: "Brian H. Toby" <Brian.Toby@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:29:56 +0100 (BST)

   Does anyone know how CIF handles numbers with "esd's" when they are
in exponential notation, (at least for DLL 1.x, where numbers may be
reported as -12.345(2) if the esd flag is true.)

   My understanding is the conventional crystallographic notation for a
number in exponential notation is 

	-1.2345(2) x 10^1

but my reading of section 59 in
is that CIF uses 


I just want to check that -1.2345(2)e1 is not valid and has never been
intended to valid in CIF.

Brian H. Toby, Ph.D.                    Leader, Crystallography Team
Brian.Toby@NIST.gov      NIST Center for Neutron Research, Stop 8562
voice: 301-975-4297     National Institute of Standards & Technology
FAX: 301-921-9847                        Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8562

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.