[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Broken _related_function in ddl_core.dic
- Subject: Broken _related_function in ddl_core.dic
- From: Richard Gildea <rgildea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:20:56 +0100
I don't know if this is the best place to post this message, so please direct me to the appropriate place if necessary.
In the current ddl_core.dic, the definition of the item _related_function has the _list item defined as "yes" (i.e. 'can only be declared in a looped list') rather than "both" (as is the case for _related_item). This therefore causes much of cif_core.dic to be invalid when validating against ddl_core.dic. It appears that this has been the case since the first published version of ddl_core.dic, however I am surprised that an error such as this hasn't been spotted beforehand.
In addition, the _type of _dictionary_version is given as 'numb', however unless there is an alternative definition of the allowed 'numb' constructs of which I am not aware (I am assuming the numeric rule in the formal BNF description of CIF grammar), I do not see how values such as '1.4.1' (the current ddl_core.dic version) can be interpreted as type 'numb'.
It seems unfortunate at best if the DDL1 specification cannot be used either to validate itself or most DDL1 dictionaries.
Thanks,
Richard
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broken _related_function in ddl_core.dic (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: _item_related.function_code
- Next by Date: Re: Broken _related_function in ddl_core.dic
- Prev by thread: Re: Restraints CIF dictionary version 1.0 released
- Next by thread: Re: Broken _related_function in ddl_core.dic
- Index(es):