[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- Subject: Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- From: Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:59:49 +0100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;bh=0WbyrWa3MldUxjLHxadSv2NR+jhrniYOvoNG8Pzd+wU=;b=qf5b52M0eZjrHria7qzqBTcD0mkkfXlJW3AW1+WFlPcvmYasM3AZw26izZnT5/fVLfUquTc9qztScPpOTI98wO9eU2gBaAu78eCXj1WxpIVWIvFGMVtICjFnqVBFJpRyXY7aDH4fGKUmC/BZh4rarcOAo+Ty5cLAB+Yb2avc/2RASfq9SPAP0r9uM33GQhsnZ9jjbvFinSaq9UfRWmgNdLtxDr+l3/NEQsupOrp9Jf88bImzvD345YyoltO6dmgxzVSC0B0lHeXhJxEQ/94IYkBnv5t8VArZfJ8s4EsAu4qyWLpClwgIVz1uzvGg8cG2jWqF+moeWN9eeQiouZUsYw==
- In-Reply-To: <DM5PR04MB05083823C1CEDFD693DD1638E0030@DM5PR04MB0508.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2fszww=4A_w6evqg=5O9KKLnujajmg_SPSX=hCRQiBPtg@mail.gmail.com><DM5PR04MB05083823C1CEDFD693DD1638E0030@DM5PR04MB0508.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> 3. We have again run into the CIF quirk of having two distinct null values,> whereas JSON has only one. Although the two-character string "\\?" is> certainly reminiscent of the special CIF ? value (as "\\." would be> reminiscent of the . value), why not instead choose a value such as "\u0001"> or "\uFFFF", which will never appear in a conforming instance of CIF’s> native serialization? Maybe boolean false instead of "\u0001"? Boolean types will also never appear._______________________________________________cif-developers mailing listcif-developers@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Draft JSON specification for CIF (James Hester)
- RE: Draft JSON specification for CIF (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- Next by Date: Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- Prev by thread: Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- Next by thread: Re: Draft JSON specification for CIF
- Index(es):