[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The full diff listing is available from the following Github link: https://github.com/COMCIFS/comcifs.github.io/commit/fe587d0c724eff97db4c31faaa8ebb09a808af1f#diff-fd4fbe8f7dc33b4a97fb39965f4e0243
and the latest draft is at https://github.com/COMCIFS/comcifs.github.io/blob/master/cif-json.md
I append the latest text below as well.
Comments welcome. If we are generally satisfied, I will submit this to COMCIFS for their approval.
James.
--
Reply to: [list | sender only]
CIF-JSON new draft
- Subject: CIF-JSON new draft
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 11:25:15 +1000
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=jXiuAf3lVb0pI2oAdA86g9lIDTKwdZli0pJib1AHVvI=;b=odA3ov5zaTMMwvBWGBhy02itY5kEo7S9IgrEqjS07bzK3j6AB3onC2UT/h9gUJ316Gw2uFdqwCxopHqb6lbqyIV1EQyH3eiHnRsuVe4YtAatACjGuCfbKCurKAk/qNTIKcA/zeMBUawzKabIeomEppmkV/FXjNok8An+ht0abx5UcyrJQOzYFHHX9Dx64JUIGEQSASVrgWpQpMekvlJvoAkdaeGDC7Qn3MlwJNqHCbdk/a6x3cjg2hSHQi4pLZsK2n30k2OQKj/1VEI4Kt1UMviqbjNnyU1gIo7mlq+JC0UDfGDMEzSiAVpH8cEGRC61lSQVqmC9z+bBwmboZlUl6w==
Dear CIF developers,
I have redrafted the CIF-JSON proposal to take account of the comments over the past few weeks. In particular, I have removed discussion of "conversion from a CIF file" and instead expressed the proposal as a JSON representation of "CIF information". I have also noted that this JSON format is not suitable for high-fidelity conversion of CIF syntax files, and added a pointer to "COD-JSON". Given the choice of 'Metadata' and 'meta data' I have opted for 'Metadata' but that is really a coin toss and we can allow both if there is no agreement.The full diff listing is available from the following Github link: https://github.com/COMCIFS/comcifs.github.io/commit/fe587d0c724eff97db4c31faaa8ebb09a808af1f#diff-fd4fbe8f7dc33b4a97fb39965f4e0243
# JSON representation of CIF information (DRAFT) ## Introduction The Crystallographic Information Framework (CIF) is a set of specifications for describing scientific information. One or more *datavalues* are attached to *datanames* to form *dataitems*. Dataitems are collected together into *datablocks*. Datablocks are in turn collected into *datafiles*. Datanames, the possible values that can be attached to them, and dataname membership in *loops* (tabulations), are described in CIF *dictionaries*. In the following standard, *CIF information* refers to any scientific information that can be defined and encapsulated using the above model. The CIF1 and CIF2 syntaxes describe closely related file formats for expressing CIF information in a form suitable for long-term archiving and transfer. JSON is a lightweight language for serialisation and transfer of data. JSON is often used as a "pipeline" language to transfer information between programs within a single system, and also as a way of transferring information between internet applications. JSON libraries are widely available and therefore it is relatively simple implement parsing and output of JSON. A standard way of expressing CIF information in JSON would allow programs from different authors running within a single context (such as a web browser or operating system) to interoperate with minimal work. The following CIF-JSON standard is intended to facilitate interoperability of such software. ## The JSON representation of CIF information In the following, *name* refers to a JSON name and *value* to a JSON value. A JSON *object* is a collection of `name:value` pairs. CIF-related datastructures are described in the introduction. CIF information is represented in JSON as follows: 1. A CIF datafile is represented as a single JSON object 1. The JSON file must conform to the i-JSON standard [RFC7493](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7493) 1. A CIF datablock is represented by a JSON object within the top-level object. This object is referred to here as the *JSON datablock object*. The name of this object must be in Unicode case-normal form (which means lower-case for Western scripts), and conform to the characterset restrictions of the CIF2 syntax for datablock names. 1. A CIF dataname is a name in the JSON datablock object. The JSON name is the CIF dataname, including the underscore. 1. Datavalues are represented as follows: 1. CIF string values are represented as JSON string values 1. CIF number values are represented as JSON string values formatted according to the `<Numeric>` production in International Tables for Crystallography, Volume G, Section 2.2.7.3 paragraph 57. Note that this CIF `<Numeric>` production is identical to the JSON number format with optional standard uncertainty appended in round brackets. 3. The special CIF value `.` (null) is represented as the JSON `null` value 4. The special CIF value `?` (unknown) is represented as a JSON string containing the single Unicode code point `0xFFFF`. 5. (CIF2 only). CIF2 list datavalues are represented as JSON lists. The datavalues appearing in the list are represented in the same way as non-list datavalues. 6. (CIF2 only). CIF2 table datavalues are represented as JSON objects. The names in the object are the same as the names in the CIF table. The values in the CIF table are represented in the same way as other CIF datavalues 7. (Looped values). The column of values corresponding to a looped CIF dataname is represented as a JSON list. This list becomes the value of the JSON name corresponding to that dataname. Each value in the list is represented as for unlooped datanames 6. A JSON datablock object may contain a special name: `loop tags`. If this name appears, its value will be a list of lists. For each loop in the CIF block, a list of the datanames appearing in the loop will be included in the `loop tags` value. 7. It is not an error to omit the `loop tags` name, even when the CIF data block contains a loop. If the `loop tags` name appears, information on all loops in the datablock must be included. 9. If the CIF data block includes save frames (currently only used in dictionaries), the JSON datablock object must contain the special name `frames`. The value of this name is a JSON object. Each name in this object is the name of a save frame found in the datablock. The value for each of these names is a JSON datablock object, represented as for normal CIF data blocks. 10. An optional object named `Metadata` may be present in the top-level object. The object name must begin with a capital 'M' to distinguish it from a normal datablock name. The `Metadata` object contains information that is useful for conversion of CIF-JSON objects to other syntaxes (for example, CIF syntax files) and information about the CIF-JSON version. The following names are defined for the `Metadata` object: 1. `cif-version`: the minimum CIF syntax version required to express the contents of the object; currently `1.1` or `2.0` are available 1. `schema-name`: always `CIF-JSON` 1. `schema-version`: the version of the CIF-JSON schema that this JSON object conforms to 1. `schema-uri`: a URI for the CIF-JSON schema. ## Comments 1. A JSON list is used both for columns and CIF2 lists. Where a dataname is known to occur in a loop (either through the `loop tags` name or as stated in the relevant CIF dictionary), the JSON parser may assume that each entry in the outermost list level is the column entry. 1. Any list-valued name that does not appear in a loop is a CIF2 list. 1. This specification contains some features to allow straightforward conversion to JSON from files in CIF syntax. However, round-tripping through CIF-JSON will not preserve features of CIF syntax that are not used by CIF dictionaries. In particular, block and dataname order, and the type of delimiters used, if any, are not expressed in CIF-JSON. If such high-fidelity transformation is required (for example, for CIF syntax validation) the COD-JSON format used by the freely available [COD tools](http://wiki.crystallography.net/cod-tools/) is recommended. ## Example ### CIF syntax file: #\#CIF_2.0 data_example _dataname.a syzygy _flight.vector [0.25 1.2(15) -0.01(12)] _dataname.table {"save":222 "mode":full "url":"http:/bit.ly/2"} _flight.bearing 221.45(7) loop_ _x.id _y _z _alpha 1 4.23(14) [a a a c] 1.5e-6(2) 2 11.9(3) [c a c a] 2.1e-6(11) 3 0.2(4) [b a a a] 0.0051(4) 4 . . ? loop_ _q.key _q.access xxp {"s":2 "k":-5} yyx {"s":1 "k":-2} _dataname.chapter 1.2 _dataname.verylong ;<whatever>\\ <whatever>This contains one very long line \ <whatever>that we wrap around using the \ <whatever>excellent CIF2 line expansion protocol. ; data_another_block _abc xyz save_internal _abc yzx loop_ _r.fruit _r.colour apple red pear green save_ ### Equivalent CIF-JSON: ```json {"Metadata":{"cif-version":2.0, "schema-name":"CIF-JSON", "schema-version":"1.0", "schema-uri":"http://www.iucr.org/resources/cif/cif-json.txt" }, "example": {"_dataname.a":"syzygy", "_flight.vector":["0.25","1.2(15)","-0.01(12)"], "_dataname.table":{"save":222, "mode":"full", "url":"http:/bit.ly/2"}, "_flight.bearing":"221.45(7)", "_x.id":["1","2","3","4"], "_y":["4.23(14)","11.9(3)","0.2(4)",null], "_z":[["a","a","a","c"], ["c","a","c","a"], ["b","a","a","a"], null], "_alpha":["1.5e-6(2)","2.1e-6(11)","5.1e-3(4)","\uFFFF"], "_q.key":["xxp","yyx"], "_q.access":[{"s":2, "k":-5},{"s":1, "k":-2}], "_dataname.chapter":"1.2", "_dataname.verylong":"This contains one very long line that we wrap around using the excellent CIF2 line expansion protocol.", "loop tags":[["_x.id","_y","_z"],["_q.key","_q.access"]], }, "another_block":{ "_abc":"xyz", "frames": {"internal":{"_abc":"yzx", "_r.fruit":["apple","pear"], "_r.colour":["red","green"]} } } } ```
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ cif-developers mailing list cif-developers@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: CIF-JSON new draft (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Marcin Wojdyr)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Andrius Merkys)
- Re: CIF-JSON new draft (Robert Hanson)
- Prev by Date: Re: Draft JSON specification, round 2
- Next by Date: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Prev by thread: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Next by thread: Re: CIF-JSON new draft
- Index(es):