[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Subject: Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- From: Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 20:29:27 +0100
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;bh=VcwrYCCmIxgiQlKFUBIi+NKcw8nWJZjAMQlYOjn2h5s=;b=dtnQyhM6Kg8cx0WYW3ASaMdgolfb1KaflXReruwZSclWiqBa0pB3TexbAwh6XcePRYpproHKmC9gvmifMA41OnFyz1tz+giVOb6b8m8u+XjgUWWv7SuErBb/eDAlclmGEHQyVc1UN6ejNB2YQfi8yJZeLCBeBWXafp5Z3JpZoYtmuhjxZTkAlchvU5yqAc8/v79+EL3NAu+O4fIOvIoZyXrqlr2gKXaSvNp2rMUadUxOuxww8Nct3VOhUGYjD+lxRW3tiSUTACdZMU8XU3cNQNQryVGUv45r4paAfdrIzw7t3Fz/87WKpyHglUAoDx0YRXBJvvifThLX7p3GggysaA==
- In-Reply-To: <MWHPR04MB0512E4FA07327A5E9103106CE0EE0@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <CAM+dB2cwoCG6LhPUePRup_hQtM9mXqwL4tULTPf-WGwJGtKrOA@mail.gmail.com><MWHPR04MB051220BFF5C7093CD86702CCE0EE0@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com><CAF_YUvW=i0XjfzmgA=m03a=X4Y03+FfH8_TAZ2dNPVAhCmuy5w@mail.gmail.com><MWHPR04MB0512E4FA07327A5E9103106CE0EE0@MWHPR04MB0512.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
> The other issue is indeed the one you describe, that CIF overall does not draw an inherent distinction between unlooped items and items presented in a single-packet loop. The mmCIF and other DDL2 dictionaries in fact explicitly disclaim any semantic distinction between those alternatives So DDL2 cannot ensure that, for example, _entry.id is a string, not alist of strings?I didn't realize that. It looks to me as a step back from DDL1 whichcan define _list yes/no/both. Marcin_______________________________________________cif-developers mailing listcif-developers@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cif-developers
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08 (Bollinger, John C)
- References:
- CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08 (James Hester)
- RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08 (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08 (Robert Hanson)
- RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08 (Bollinger, John C)
- Prev by Date: RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Next by Date: RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Prev by thread: RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Next by thread: RE: CIF-JSON draft 2017-05-08
- Index(es):