Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cif2-encoding] Drafting issues

Before I post my revised text, I have only just realised (upon close perusal of the two texts) that Herbert's motion is substantially the same as the 'Changes' document, just without the headings etc, so we are discussing almost the same document.  My apologies for the confusion.

James.

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:37 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Group,

As I think we have reached a consensus in principle, and are now moving into discussion of precise definitions, let us have wording arguments only once (that is, for a single document).  I think that our base document must be the one that the DDLm group agreed on - the link once again is http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/41426/cif2_syntax_changes_jrh20100705.pdf - simply because it will be unnecessarily confusing for the DDLm group to deal with two documents at once, and the 'Changes' document is admirably precise.  I reiterate once again that I am happy with the motion that Herbert presented, with the proviso that one paragraph is rewritten as I have recently proposed.  Herbert - if you would like to negotiate that paragraph with me by Skype, I'm happy to do that too. 

I have appended a text version of what I consider to be the relevant sections of the 'changes' document to this message.  I am happy to provide the complete document in OpenOffice format to anybody who would like it.  Herbert - if you think any of the non-encoding discussion in your motion is not already covered in the 'Changes' document, please advise.

I will be posting my own suggestion, largely based on parts of the motion that Herbert and I drafted yesterday, in a reply to this email.

CIF - Changes to the specification

05 July 2010

This document specifies changes to the syntax of CIF. We refer to the current syntax specification of CIF as CIF1, and the new specification as CIF2. To date all archival CIFs are CIF1.

The changes to syntax are necessitated by the adoption of new dictionary functionalities that introduce several extensions, including new data types, and method definitions using dREL.

It is assumed the reader has a thorough understanding of the CIF1 specification.

TERMINOLOGY

Reference to character(s) means abstract characters assigned code points by Unicode. Specific characters are referenced according to Unicode convention, U⁠+⁠xxxx[x[x]], where xxxx[x[x]] is the four- to six-digit hexadecimal representation of the assigned code point. The designated character encoding for CIF2 is UTF-8.

Reference to ASCII characters means characters U⁠+⁠0000 through U⁠+⁠007F, or, equivalently the first 128 characters of the ISO 8859 1 (LATIN 1) character set.

Reference to newline or \n means the sequence that conventionally terminates a line record (which is environment dependent). See Change 3.

Reference to whitespace means the characters ASCII space (U⁠+⁠0020), ASCII horizontal tab (U⁠+⁠0009) and the newline characters. Without regard to local convention, the various other characters that Unicode classifies as whitespace (character categories Zs and Zp) do not constitute whitespace for the purposes of CIF2.

PREAMBLE

CIF2 significantly extends CIF1 functionality, primarily through new dictionary features. CIF2 is not fully backwards-compatible with CIF1: many files compliant with CIF1 are also compliant with CIF2, but some are not (see especially change 5, below). The CIF1 standard will continue to operate for the foreseeable future in parallel with CIF2.

CHANGE 1 ‒ NEW (MAGIC CODE)

A CIF2 file is uniquely identified by a required magic code at the beginning of its first line. The code is,

#\#CIF_2.0

followed immediately by whitespace.

CHANGE 2 NEW (CHARACTER SET)

CIF2 files are standard variable length text files, which for compatibility with older processing systems will have a maximum line length of 2048 characters. As discussed above and below, however, there are some restrictions on the character set for token delimiters, separators and data names.

In keeping with XML restrictions we allow the characters

U⁠+⁠0009 U⁠+⁠000A U⁠+⁠000D
U⁠+⁠0020 – U+007E
U+00A0 - U⁠+⁠D7FF
U⁠+⁠E000 – U+FDCF
U⁠+⁠FDF0 - U+FFFD
U⁠+⁠10000 - U⁠+⁠10FFFD

In addition, character U+FEFF and characters U+xFFFE or U+xFFFF where x is any hexadecimal digit are disallowed. Unicode reserves the code points E000 – F8FF for private use. The IUCr and only the IUCr may specify what characters are assigned to these code points in the context of CIF2.

Reasoning: There is growing demand for the wider character set afforded by Unicode to be made available in applications, especially those where internationalisation is an issue.


--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148



--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________
cif2-encoding mailing list
cif2-encoding@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/cif2-encoding

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.