[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- From: [email protected] (Sydney R Hall)
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 13:44:58 GMT
This would not be the first neutron study to appear in Section C so
presumably other authors were not so squeamish about using the existing
data items in the cif submission. Nevertheless, these data items were
intended for x-ray studies, so possibly new items are needed for neutron
and electron diffraction studies. One should note however that the
definition...
data_diffrn_radiation_probe
_name '_diffrn_radiation_probe'
_category diffrn_radiation
_type char
_list both
_list_reference '_diffrn_radiation_wavelength_id'
loop_ _enumeration x-ray
neutron
electron
gamma
_definition
; Name of the type of radiation used. It is strongly encouraged
that this field be specified so that the probe radiation
can be simply determined.
;
identifies the radiation type, so that the possibility also exists for
making the units of _refine_diff_density_min and _max implicit.... though
this could prove messy if one was searching a cif archive just on these
items. Its highly likely that other definitions would be needed as well...
noting that all of the _refln_F_* items are defined in electrons at the
moment. And of course with the increasing use of electron diffraction there
will be a need for structure factor coefficients etc. in Volts as well.
My inclination would be use the existing definitions in a generic fashion
with the units linked to the radiation employed... its simpler and would
avoid the triplication (more perhaps) of all radiation-dependent items.
On the other hand my point of view is more that of an author and user
rather than an archivalist... and readily admit that from a publisher's
point of view the assignment of units to generic data items is not as
straightforward as is possible with explicit definitions.
Cheers, Syd.
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Next by Date: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Prev by thread: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Next by thread: Re: Neutron diffraction experiments
- Index(es):

