[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
Printing of multiple geometry values
- To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
- Subject: Printing of multiple geometry values
- From: Brian McMahon <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 11:57:13 +0100 (BST)
Dear Colleagues
David Brown has noticed that for many papers in Acta C (generally inorganic
structures), in the tables of bond length, where multiple symmetry-related
bonds occur, a multiplicity factor is often printed, e.g.
Ba(1) O(2) 2.316(3) x6
He has raised the question with the Chester Editorial Office of whether this
information could be stored in a CIF, using some new data name such as
_geom_bond_mult. Amanda Berry at Chester has pointed out to me that papers
are received with entries such as
Ba(1) O(2)^i,iii^ 2.316(3) x2
and even
Ba(1) O(2)^i,iii^ 2.316(3) x4
I'm not sure what one should make of the latter case.
Amanda says "A non-standard table [i.e. a table generated with some local
data names of the type _geom_extra_tableA_col_1] is the easiest method for
us and this would give the author more flexibility in preparing tables for
publication in Acta C and, in the above case, Acta B. The authors could still
list all of geometry in the usual loops with the _publ_flag set to 'no'."
This is of course largely a matter of presentation in the journal; but I am
interested in the views of other members of this group.
Regards
Brian
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Re: Modus operandi of COMCIFS Core Dictionary Maintenance Group
- Next by Date: Re: Transfer from msCIF: refine_ls_class category
- Prev by thread: Re: Expressions for R factors
- Next by thread: Re: Printing of multiple geometry values
- Index(es):

