[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
CIF description of twinning
- To: Multiple recipients of list <[email protected]>
- Subject: CIF description of twinning
- From: Brian McMahon <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 10:44:00 +0100 (BST)
Dear Colleagues
I am sending this mailing to two discussion lists: the CIF Core dictionary
management group, and the structural chemistry list recently established
by Judy Flippen-Anderson. There has been some discussion recently among
structural chemists that it is rather difficult to extract information about
(or even identification of) twinned crystal structures, for example from the
Cambridge Structural database. One way of addressing this is of course to
have community standard ways of describing twinning in database entries.
Judy plans to canvass the strchem members for their views on what is needed.
I recalled our earlier discussions on twinning in the coreDMG which prompted
the proposal of the following definitions, and so I offer them (a) as a
catalyst for the strchem discussion and (b) as a reminder of unfinished
coreDMG business (this is the third of my promised topics for extending the
Core dictionary to version 2.3).
The listing here incorporates Gotzon's initial proposals and Howard's
response. Readers new to the discussion will find the complete discussion
with carefully argued rationale at
http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/lists/coredmg/msg00123.html
http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/lists/coredmg/msg00143.html
http://www.iucr.org/iucr-top/lists/coredmg/msg00146.html
I would suggest we proceed by inviting the strchem list to discuss their
perceived requirements for a while (in general terms rather than proposing
CIF definitions as such). I shall monitor the strchem discussion and bring
back any discussion to the coredmg list for consideration in a subsequent
review of these CIF names.
The proposed definitions are:
===============================================================================
data_diffrn_reflns_twin_id
_name '_diffrn_reflns_twin_id'
_category diffrn_reflns
_type char
_list yes
_list_link_child '_refine_ls_twin_id'
_definition
; A unique identifier for each domain state whose presence
is assumed to be permissible.
;
data_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_
loop_ _name '_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_11'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_12'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_13'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_21'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_22'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_23'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_31'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_32'
'_diffrn_reflns_twin_matrix_33'
_category diffrn_reflns
_type numb
_list yes
_list_reference '_diffrn_reflns_twin_id'
_definition
; The set of twin-law matrices in which the ith matrix transforms
the Miller indices of a reflection in the first domain state
into those of the twin-equivalent reflection resulting from
the ith domain state. A twin law transformation of Miller
indices is written in matrix form as:
(h~i~) (m~11~ m~12~ m~13~) (h~1~)
(k~i~) = (m~21~ m~22~ m~23~) (h~2~)
(l~i~) (m~31~ m~32~ m~33~) (h~3~)
The twin matrices are referred to the basis reciprocal to
that derived from _cell_length_ and _cell_angle_. It is
mandatory to specify all twin-law matrices, including that
of the identity.
;
data_refine_ls_twin_id
_name '_refine_ls_twin_id'
_category refine
_type char
_list yes
_list_link_parent '_diffrn_reflns_twin_id'
_definition
; The identifier of one domain state. This must be
identical to a _diffrn_reflns_twin_id.
;
data_refine_ls_twin_fraction
_category refine
_type numb
_type_conditions esd
_list yes
_list_reference 'refine_ls_twin_id'
_enumeration_range 0.0:1.0
_definition
; The refined values of the twin fractions. Twin fractions, k(i),
are defined through the following expression:
G~c~=s^2^ Sumi k(i)|F|^2^~c,i~ (i=1,n)
Sumi k(i) = 1 (i=1,n)
where G~c~ is the calculated twinned intensity for reflection
h1 h2 h3, F~c,i~ the calculated structure factor of domain
state i, s the overall scale factor and n the number of domain
states. It is mandatory to specify the refined twin fractions
of all domain states.
The _enumeration_range of 0.0:1.0 is correctly interpreted as
meaning (0.0 - 3u) =< x =< (1.0 + 3u).
;
data_refine_diff_twin_F_obs_deconvolution_description
_name '_refine_diff_twin_F_obs_deconvolution_description'
_category refine
_type char
_definition
; A description of the method used to calculate the
Fourier coefficients used in electron density calculations.
;
===============================================================================
Regards
Brian
[Send comment to list secretary]
[Reply to list (subscribers only)]
- Prev by Date: Rigid-group identification
- Next by Date: Re: CIF description of twinning
- Prev by thread: Re: Request for new data name _citation_database_id_CSD
- Next by thread: Re: CIF description of twinning
- Index(es):

