[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [dddwg] Study concerning the quality of publicly archived data
- To: IUCr Working Group on Diffraction data Deposition <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [dddwg] Study concerning the quality of publicly archived data
- From: "Stephen K. Burley Rutgers Proteomics" <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:03:35 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Thanks John Happy New Year SKB On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:58:55 +0000, John Helliwell<[email protected]> wrote:> Hi,>http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295> Highlighted in Science 15th January 2016 pages 237 to 238.> Greetings,> John > > Emeritus Prof of Chemistry John R Helliwell DSc_Physics > > _______________________________________________> dddwg mailing list> [email protected]> http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dddwg_______________________________________________dddwg mailing [email protected]http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dddwg
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [dddwg] Study concerning the quality of publicly archived data (John Helliwell)
- Prev by Date: [dddwg] Study concerning the quality of publicly archived data
- Next by Date: [dddwg] Overview article from Syd Hall and Brian McMahon;Interesting!
- Prev by thread: [dddwg] Study concerning the quality of publicly archived data
- Next by thread: [dddwg] DDDWG update for the BCA
- Index(es):

