[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- From: Brian McMahon <bm@iucr.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:41:26 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <279aad2a0910120833g73d86b43t57377db2caed0196@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20091012063729.U94953@epsilon.pair.com><C6F9556A.12057%nick@csse.uwa.edu.au><279aad2a0910120833g73d86b43t57377db2caed0196@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:33:56PM +0300, James Hester wrote: > Point of clarification: when I stated that tokens would always be > separated by whitespace, I did not have in mind the contents of > bracketed constructs; for the purposes of this discussion I consider > that the whole bracketed construct is a single token (which is > obviously a simplification). I'm not sure in which sense Brian > understood this condition. Yes, I also meant it in that sense. Brian _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (James Hester)
- Prev by Date: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Index(es):