[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- To: [email protected], Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- From: James Hester <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:36:37 +0300
- In-Reply-To: <C6F975C5.12069%[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><C6F975C5.12069%[email protected]>
I, for one, do not agree with dropping the requirement for whitespace between tokens outside compound structures. Is the only justification avoiding a second production rule in the formal grammar? I would like to think we are getting more than this in return for sacrificing human readability: see previous email somewhere long ago in this thread. -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907 F +61 (02) 9717 3145 M +61 (04) 0249 4148 _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (Nick Spadaccini)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings. (Nick Spadaccini)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] THREAD 3: The alphabet of non-delimited strings.
- Index(es):