[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- From: Nick Spadaccini <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:53:59 +0800
- Authentication-Results: postfix;
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On 13/10/09 10:46 PM, "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> wrote: > The simple cure (just use C-I/O) is not acceptable to certain major > crytallographic application developers. On that, too, there are fixes > in the wings, but not solid yet. > > For now, I think we need to include trailing blank stripping in the spec. C-I/O-*nix person here doesn't quite understand what the issue is here. It has been a long time since I programmed in Fortran. Can you clarify please. I don't understand why issues with padding need to be dealt with in a specification. cheers Nick -------------------------------- Associate Professor N. Spadaccini, PhD School of Computer Science & Software Engineering The University of Western Australia t: +61 (0)8 6488 3452 35 Stirling Highway f: +61 (0)8 6488 1089 CRAWLEY, Perth, WA 6009 AUSTRALIA w3: www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~nick MBDP M002 CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G e: [email protected] _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8 (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] [THREAD 4] UTF8
- Index(es):