[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:40:31 +1100
- In-Reply-To: <572182.92308.qm@web87003.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
- References: <C7306520.1258E%nick@csse.uwa.edu.au><572182.92308.qm@web87003.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
The outstanding issue seems to be around where in the process these elides get stripped; Herb and John argue that it should be possible to do this in an optional way at the dictionary stage. As I've already indicated, I don't think that it is that straightforward. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:35 PM, SIMON WESTRIP <simonwestrip@btinternet.com> wrote: > So at the risk of repeating myself, at this stage there seems to be majority > acceptance of > what I've been refering to as context-sensitive treatment of elides: > > Using the trivial example of _label "A\"BC" > > James and Nick would return A"BC > > Herb and John would return A\"BC > > I would return A"BC > > I wont address Herb's examples as I performed a similar exercise back in > THREAD3 > which was then received with a different opinion :-) > -- T +61 (02) 9717 9907 F +61 (02) 9717 3145 M +61 (04) 0249 4148 _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings (Joe Krahn)
- References:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings (Nick Spadaccini)
- Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] CIF header
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Use of elides in strings
- Index(es):