Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Space as a list item separator>

Since this issue is not yet fully closed, for clarification as delimiters of
tokens within a compound data type, comma and space are not exactly
equivalent. The delimiters (that are equivalent) are

 [:space:]+  # --- for white space delimited

 [:space:]* , [:space:]*  # --- for comma delimited

[:space:] matches a single whitespace character, * is the Kleene Star
meaning zero (0) or more instances of a matche and + is the Kleene Plus
meaning one (1) or more instances of the match.

With that qualification, I agree with Herb's assessment.

On 1/12/09 8:35 PM, "Herbert J. Bernstein" <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com>
wrote:

> If both comma and space are permitted then I would treat
> 
> [1, 2, 3  4 ]   or  [1,2,3 4]
> 
> as equivalent and equivalent to
> 
> [1 2 3 4] and [1 , 2 , 3 , 4] and [ 1 2 3 4 ]
> 
> At least that is the way I have coded CIFtbx and CBFlib.
> =====================================================
>   Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
>     Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
>          Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
> 
>                   +1-631-244-3035
>                   yaya@dowling.edu
> =====================================================
> 
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, John Westbrook wrote:
> 
>> Could I ask for a clarification of the interpretation of a mixed case
>> such as:
>> 
>> [1, 2, 3  4 ]   or  [1,2,3 4]
>> 
>> If quote and space are permitted are the above going to satisfy the
>> syntax requiremens?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:
>>> First amending the arguments
>>> 
>>> To summarise the arguments:
>>> 
>>> 1. In favour of both space and comma
>>>    - comma is used in some other non-CIF contexts as a list delimiter
>>>    - comma allows a large subset of lists and arrays to be carried
>>> opaquely in CIF 1 and CIF 1.1 documents.
>>> 
>>> 2. Against comma:
>>>    - A single type of separator makes the grammar simpler
>>>    - Space is used everywhere else in CIF as a separator (consistency)
>>>    - Comma can then be used in non-delimited strings
>>> 
>>> Then
>>> 
>>> I vote for comma and space -- Herbert
>>> 
>>> =====================================================
>>>  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
>>>    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
>>>         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769
>>> 
>>>                  +1-631-244-3035
>>>                  yaya@dowling.edu
>>> =====================================================
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, James Hester wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Dear CIF2 people: the time has come to vote on the list item separator
>>>> issue.  Firstly: as far as I know, nobody is against space as a
>>>> separator,
>>>> so spaces will be possible list item separators.  Some may be against
>>>> commas, so this vote is on whether or not to allow commas.
>>>> 
>>>> To summarise the arguments:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. In favour of both space and comma
>>>>    - comma is used in some other non-CIF contexts as a list delimiter
>>>> 
>>>> 2. Against comma:
>>>>    - A single type of separator makes the grammar simpler
>>>>    - Space is used everywhere else in CIF as a separator (consistency)
>>>>    - Comma can then be used in non-delimited strings
>>>> 
>>>> Space only: Nick, James (Nick is here)
>>>> Comma and Space: ?
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>       More specifically, CIF1.1 excludes square brackets as the first
>>>>       character in a non-delimited string.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:33 AM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>       Dear Herbert: as CIF 1.1 doesn't define lists, I'm not
>>>>       sure why you suggest that the example below is a valid
>>>>       tag.
>>>> 
>>>>       On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Herbert J. Bernstein
>>>>       <yaya@bernstein-plus-sons.com> wrote:
>>>>             Sorry something got lost in the prior message.
>>>>              It should have
>>>>             read:
>>>> 
>>>>                   Dear Colleagues,
>>>> 
>>>>                    Back to the question of commas.
>>>>                    If you accept the desirability of
>>>>                   having a CIF 1.5, commas in lists
>>>>                   become very useful.  Someone with
>>>>                   a CIF 1.1 editor will be able to
>>>>                   prepare a CIF 1.5 file for many
>>>>                   useful cases by doing all lists
>>>>                   with commas and no embedded blanks
>>>>                   as long as they can make their
>>>>                   lists fit on single lines.  In CIF
>>>>                   1.1
>>>> 
>>>>                   [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],[7,8,9]]
>>>> 
>>>>                   is a valid value for a tag, but
>>>> 
>>>>                   [[1 2 3] [4 5 6] [7 8 9]]
>>>> 
>>>> is not.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No, neither example is a valid CIF 1.1 tag.  CIF 1.1 explicitly
>>>> excludes brackets as the first character of a non-delimited
>>>> string.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>             Having the option of commas in lists
>>>>             will help to smooth the
>>>>             transition for at least some people.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
>>>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
>>>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
>>>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
>>>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
>>>> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
>>>> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ddlm-group mailing list
>>> ddlm-group@iucr.org
>>> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ddlm-group mailing list
>> ddlm-group@iucr.org
>> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> ddlm-group@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

cheers

Nick

--------------------------------
Associate Professor N. Spadaccini, PhD
School of Computer Science & Software Engineering

The University of Western Australia    t: +61 (0)8 6488 3452
35 Stirling Highway                    f: +61 (0)8 6488 1089
CRAWLEY, Perth,  WA  6009 AUSTRALIA   w3: www.csse.uwa.edu.au/~nick
MBDP  M002

CRICOS Provider Code: 00126G

e: Nick.Spadaccini@uwa.edu.au




_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.