Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] On process

Sounds reasonble to me.  I think the process will help us
come to much needed closure on CIF2 and DDLm. Full speed
ahead!!! -- Herbert

=====================================================
  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                  +1-631-244-3035
                  yaya@dowling.edu
=====================================================

On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Brian McMahon wrote:

> Colleagues
>
> Like Buridan's ass we are starving to death between the equally
> enticing mound of hay that is UTF-8 and the smorgasbord of mixed
> vegetables offered by multiple encodings.
>
> I suggest that this group complete a *draft* CIF2 specification
> that describes (if necessary) specific character allusions in
> terms of a canonical UTF-8 encoding, and states that UTF-8 is the
> designated encoding for files conformant to the specification.
>
> Post the completed draft in the first instance to the cif-developers
> list (since that is supposed to the the most relevant target audience),
> but certainly to other lists at the same time if folk think that would
> be productive. By all means accompany the release with a commentary on
> the difficulties we have faced over the encoding issue; by all means
> implement a survey and analyse the results to assess community demand
> for an upward revision of the draft - but let us give people something
> concrete to begin with, and challenge them actively to protest if the
> proposal will impede their work.
>
> Note that this proposal doesn't necessarily reflect a personal
> preference for a single mandatory encoding - I still cannot
> decide which I "prefer". But if the suggested draft is published,
> I will not vote against it unless I suddenly see clearly a real
> problem that it would throw up in the way of any applications I
> would envisage writing. I would hope "the community" would respond
> in similar vein, so that stated objections would both represent real
> difficulties and help to define the environments giving rise to these
> real difficulties.
>
> Best wishes
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> ddlm-group@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.