[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .. .
- From: "Bollinger, John C" <John.Bollinger@STJUDE.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:08:21 -0500
- Accept-Language: en-US
- acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1009301557000.62875@epsilon.pair.com>
- References: <4C471374.6000100@mcmaster.ca><alpine.BSF.2.00.1007211307460.37813@epsilon.pair.com><AANLkTinyxmyKFOt=A6Cpdq=8LVsSR4+Js9xDOG+JEF--@mail.gmail.com><AANLkTimTab=b9u6nsUjd6UitRni-OgMTJNZYt1EMjrhE@mail.gmail.com><a06240804c8ca43f92cc2@[192.168.2.104]><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDF3@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009301317510.76563@epsilon.pair.com><152994.37345.qm@web87011.mail.ird.yahoo.com><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009301525330.62875@epsilon.pair.com><8F77913624F7524AACD2A92EAF3BFA5416659DEDF7@SJMEMXMBS11.stjude.sjcrh.local><alpine.BSF.2.00.1009301557000.62875@epsilon.pair.com>
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:02 PM, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote: >The confusion arises from the original CIF 1.1 document which >first discusses the allow whitespace characters, and then the >syntax token <WhiteSpace>. Ah. Thank you, that makes sense now. > We should clarify it, but we >should clarify the role of whitespace both for CIF1 and CIF2, >not just in the CIF2 change document. I'm not clear on what would be needed here, but on general principles I am in favor of clarifying the spec(s). >In any case, it appears that what we have so far _does_ permit >comments within bracketed constructs. I agree, and that suits me fine. Best regards, John -- John C. Bollinger, Ph.D. Department of Structural Biology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (David Brown)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] import and loops in ddlm (James Hester)
- [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] A modest addition to the DDLm spec. .. .
- Index(es):