[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
From: James Hester <[email protected]>
To: ddlm-group <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 October, 2010 23:52:08
Subject: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
Dear DDLm group,
The encoding group that was split off this group and tasked with
developing a mutually satisfactory approach to encodings in CIF2 has
now produced an updated draft of the CIF2 'changes' document. Brian
has posted this on the IUCr website at
http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/41911/cif2_syntax_changes_jrh20101005.pdf
The changes relative to the July draft are in section 2 describing the
character set, and some additional text in section 1.
Once we resolve the string concatenation operator issue, I think we
are in good shape to take CIF2 to COMCIFS for approval. I would once
again urge anybody with any outstanding issues regarding DDLm or dREL
to bring those issues up as soon as possible.
James.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- From: SIMON WESTRIP <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:57:49 +0100 (BST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Dear all
"Once we resolve the string concatenation operator issue..."
Is this issue still on the table?
Cheers
Simon
"Once we resolve the string concatenation operator issue..."
Is this issue still on the table?
Cheers
Simon
From: James Hester <[email protected]>
To: ddlm-group <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 5 October, 2010 23:52:08
Subject: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
Dear DDLm group,
The encoding group that was split off this group and tasked with
developing a mutually satisfactory approach to encodings in CIF2 has
now produced an updated draft of the CIF2 'changes' document. Brian
has posted this on the IUCr website at
http://www.iucr.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/41911/cif2_syntax_changes_jrh20101005.pdf
The changes relative to the July draft are in section 2 describing the
character set, and some additional text in section 1.
Once we resolve the string concatenation operator issue, I think we
are in good shape to take CIF2 to COMCIFS for approval. I would once
again urge anybody with any outstanding issues regarding DDLm or dREL
to bring those issues up as soon as possible.
James.
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Updated draft from subgroup discussing encodings
- Index(es):