[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator

• To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• From: "Herbert J. Bernstein" <[email protected]>
• Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:26:30 -0400 (EDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>

Aye. -- Herbert

=====================================================
  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                  +1-631-244-3035
                  [email protected]
=====================================================

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, James Hester wrote:

> Dear DDLm group members,
> 
> It appears that we have exhausted the discussion on the pros and cons of a
> concatenation operator.� I'd therefore like to call for a vote on the
> following:
> 
> "That a datavalue concatenation operator be added to the CIF2 syntax.� The
> concatenation operator shall be a single underscore, placed between the two
> datavalues to be concatenated and separated from each of them by
> whitespace.� The concatenation operator may only be used to concatenate
> delimited datavalues."
> 
> James.
> --
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> 
>

_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
[email protected]
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• References:
  • [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator (James Hester)

• Prev by Date: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• Prev by thread: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Vote on concatenation operator
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread