Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] Moving forward with DDLm

Dear Colleagues,

   While I believe that DDLm as currently proposed is, like
CIF2, incomplete and insufficient to serve its intended
purpose, I believe it is a reasonable base upon which to
build what is needed to, for example, support imgCIF.
Therefore, I do not object James Hester's proposed plan
of action, so we will have something stable to work from
as a base.

   Regards,
     Herbert

=====================================================
  Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science
    Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121
         Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769

                  +1-631-244-3035
                  yaya@dowling.edu
=====================================================

On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, James Hester wrote:

> Dear DDLm group,
>
> Now that the CIF2 syntax specification is well on the way to approval,
> our energies can be turned towards the remaining pieces in the puzzle,
> which are DDLm and dREL.
>
> DDLm and dREL are the result of at least a decade of development and
> consultation. Given the lack of objections to the DDLm specification
> within this group, I am satisfied that the draft of DDLm that is
> currently posted is sufficiently well-developed to serve as a version
> 0.99 document that can be accepted by COMCIFS under its normal
> dictionary acceptance procedure.   This group would then become the
> DDLm dictionary maintenance group (subject to formal COMCIFS
> approval).  Meanwhile, work needs to be done to produce DDLm versions
> of current DDL1 and DDL2 dictionaries; this may expose some minor
> flaws in the DDLm specification which I believe can be dealt with as
> DDLm updates.  Once a few such DDLm dictionaries are ready, we should
> then be ready to release a 1.0 DDLm specification together with
> accompanying dictionaries.  I note here that David Brown has already
> prepared a draft Core dictionary in DDLm based on Nick and Syd's
> version.
>
> Therefore, please indicate if you agree to submit DDLm and dREL to
> COMCIFS for approval without further discussion on this list.  In any
> case, if no objections are received by the end of the year (the expiry
> of the term for objections to the CIF2 specification) I will submit
> both DDLm and dREL to COMCIFS for approval in the New Year.
>
> James.
> -- 
> T +61 (02) 9717 9907
> F +61 (02) 9717 3145
> M +61 (04) 0249 4148
> _______________________________________________
> ddlm-group mailing list
> ddlm-group@iucr.org
> http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
>
_______________________________________________
ddlm-group mailing list
ddlm-group@iucr.org
http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Council for Science (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ICSU Committee on Data. Member of ICSTI, the International Council for Scientific and Technical Information. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

ICSU Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.