Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .

On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:07 AM, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:

>   I do not believe it is appropriate to add major changes in
>parsing to CIF1 at this time, so whatever happens with the
>prefix proposal, I would urge that both the line folding
>protocol and the prefix protocol be (optional) semantic
>features for CIF1 files.

My understanding was that we were considering the Grazulis proposal only for CIF 2.  Lest there be any ambiguity, I clarify that I am in favor of adding it only to CIF 2, not to CIF 1.1.  My earlier comments about CIF 1.1 data types were aimed at the question of backwards compatibility, not at actually incorporating Grazulis into CIF 1.1.



Email Disclaimer:  www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer

ddlm-group mailing list

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.