[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how toincorporatei nto CIF?. .. .. .. .
- To: Group finalising DDLm and associated dictionaries <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how toincorporatei nto CIF?. .. .. .. .
- From: "Bollinger, John C" <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:58:06 -0500
- Accept-Language: en-US
- acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 12:38 PM, SIMON WESTRIP wrote: >I'd be happy enough to see this as part of CIF2 - its particularly elegant with respect to 'CIF in CIF'. >It probably doesn't provide the convenience that I suspect the proponents of python-type eliding >are looking for, but perhaps I'll be proved wrong in this :-) It clearly doesn't provide all the features that full-Python-syntax proponents seem to want, but I'm not certain that "convenience" is among those. On the other hand, some of the full-Python-syntax opponents' objections are specifically to the number and nature of the features Python strings offer. All that notwithstanding, all the Python-like feature proposals currently on the table apply only to """/'''-quoted values, therefore the text-prefix proposal is orthogonal to them. Or it is as I proposed it, at least. It does not conflict with any of the Python-like proposals. As far as convenience goes, however, I think the text prefix proposal would be far more convenient to apply to a block of arbitrary text, because you don't have to analyze the text if you don't wish to do so. You can just preemptively prefix and fold lines. The only thing that matters is where the newlines are in the original text. John -- John C. Bollinger, Ph.D. Department of Structural Biology St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer _______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list [email protected] http://scripts.iucr.org/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- References:
- [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporate intoCIF? (James Hester)
- Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. . (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .. . (Bollinger, John C)
- Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .. . (SIMON WESTRIP)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .. .
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .. .
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] The Grazulis eliding proposal: how to incorporateinto CIF?. .. .
- Index(es):