Discussion List Archives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ddlm-group] A dictionary-writing workshop in Hyderabad?

Count me in -
On 11/9/16 6:35 PM, Herbert J. Bernstein wrote:> I agree that a concrete objective is desirable, and a CIF dictionary is certainly a useful product to try for, but the main> objective should be content organized in a way that>   1.  Clarifies the terminology used in the target domain;>   2.  Integrates well with the terminology used in related target domains; and>   3.  Integrates well with use in databases> It is quite possible to write a valid CIF domain dictionary that satisfies none of those objectives; so it might be worth some time> on those issues.>> I also think we should build on your suggestion about NeXus and provide at least some practical guidance in how to move between a> CIF dictionary and a NeXus application definition.>>   Regards,>     Herbert>>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:24 PM, James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com <mailto:jamesrhester@gmail.com>> wrote:>>     I agree with John W that the considerations in writing dictionaries are largely technology-agnostic, and indeed my proposal>     would be that a large component of the workshop would be separate from any particular ontological language and indeed applicable>     to e.g. NeXus-style efforts.  I think, however, that the workshop has to have a concrete (perhaps stretch) goal, which is that>     actual draft CIF dictionaries/definitions are started (or even finished) as a result of the workshop, which means that towards>     the end of the workshop an introduction to DDL2 and DDLm would be needed.>>     I've had some offline encouragement so I plan to move this idea along.  I will probably take discussions offline (with perhaps>     some progress updates to this group), so if you would like to be included in further discussions please let me know.>>     James.>>>     On 6 November 2016 at 06:02, john.westbrook@rcsb.org <mailto:john.westbrook@rcsb.org> <john.westbrook@rcsb.org>     <mailto:john.westbrook@rcsb.org>> wrote:>>         Hi all,>>         We continue to actively engage our producer and consumer communities in the macromolecular>         domain in developing content extensions that are compatible with our DDL2 infrastructure.>         Increasingly this involves developing compatible content extensions for domains outside>         of the traditional diffraction methods.>>         As David Brown has observed, there is a significant intellectual component in carefully>         defining a domain dictionary content and these are fairly distinct from the particular>         choice for encoding this information.>>         I would suggest to focus any workshop more specifically on the fundamental aspects of>         data definition and organization.   From a technology perspective I would prefer that>         the discussion also address how to contribute content for macromolecular applications as>         well.>>         Regards,>>         John>>>>>         On 11/2/16 10:29 PM, James Hester wrote:>>             Dear DDLm group,>>             From time to time I get enquiries on creating CIF dictionaries for various disciplines (pressure, reflectometry, electron>             diffraction are the most recent).  It occurs to me that there might be sufficient interest in the general and technical>             aspects of>             CIF dictionaries that a one-day workshop at Hyderabad would be worthwhile.  At the conclusion of the workshop,>             participants should>             be able to produce a syntactically-correct (DDLm) dictionary with consistent and correct semantics, and the attendees>             would be>             invited to come prepared with a list of concepts that they would like to put into a dictionary.  In a broader sense, the>             workshop>             would kick-start new dictionary efforts and may interact nicely with those commissions that are being pushed to produce some>             metadata for their fields by the DDDWG/IUCr executive.  In an ideal world, the content of dictionaries begun at the>             workshop could>             be finalised in consultation with colleagues on the spot during the IUCr conference, whether at commission meetings or>             in ad-hoc>             discussions, and some of us could make ourselves available for immediate consultation throughout the meeting.>>             Suggested topics:>             (1) Introduction: dictionary layout, role the dictionary plays, what is a category?>             (2) First steps: collecting and classifying concepts (single-valued, multi-valued, assigned, measured, derived,...)>             (3) Sorting concepts into categories>             (4) Writing the human-readable definitions>             (5) Assigning datanames>             (6) Assigning attributes; overview of available attributes>             (7) Describing interaction with other CIF dictionaries (import)>             (8) How expansion works (the _audit.schema system)>             (9) Adding to existing dictionaries>>             I would not propose covering dREL in detail due to time constraints. Note also that much of the material is not CIF>             specific, but>             whether we want to sell it that way I'm not sure.  There would be plenty of "practical" sessions where participants>             actually worked>             on their own dictionary - we might choose a useful mini-topic as an example for those who haven't come with any>             particular field in>             mind.>>             It would also be useful to have some DDLm dictionary-writing tools (checkers/GUIs) available, if anybody has something>             they could>             polish up in time.>>             What does the rest of the group think of this idea?  While I'm happy to take a lead role in putting it together, we>             would need some>             volunteers to help prepare materials, present, and wander around the room helping.>>             all the best,>             James.>             -->             T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%209907>>             F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%203145>>             M +61 (04) 0249 4148 <tel:%2B61%20%2804%29%200249%204148>>>>             _______________________________________________>             ddlm-group mailing list>             ddlm-group@iucr.org <mailto:ddlm-group@iucr.org>>             http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group <http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group>>>>         -->         John Westbrook, Ph.D.>         RCSB, Protein Data Bank>         Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey>         Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology>         174 Frelinghuysen Rd>         Piscataway, NJ 08854-8087>         e-mail: john.westbrook@rcsb.org <mailto:john.westbrook@rcsb.org>>         Ph: (848) 445-4290 <tel:%28848%29%20445-4290> Fax: (732) 445-4320 <tel:%28732%29%20445-4320>>         _______________________________________________>         ddlm-group mailing list>         ddlm-group@iucr.org <mailto:ddlm-group@iucr.org>>         http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group <http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group>>>>>>     -->     T +61 (02) 9717 9907 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%209907>>     F +61 (02) 9717 3145 <tel:%2B61%20%2802%29%209717%203145>>     M +61 (04) 0249 4148>>     _______________________________________________>     ddlm-group mailing list>     ddlm-group@iucr.org <mailto:ddlm-group@iucr.org>>     http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group <http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group>>>>>> _______________________________________________> ddlm-group mailing list> ddlm-group@iucr.org> http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group>
-- John Westbrook, Ph.D.RCSB, Protein Data BankRutgers, The State University of New JerseyDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology174 Frelinghuysen RdPiscataway, NJ 08854-8087e-mail: john.westbrook@rcsb.orgPh: (848) 445-4290 Fax: (732) 445-4320_______________________________________________ddlm-group mailing listddlm-group@iucr.orghttp://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group

Reply to: [list | sender only]
International Union of Crystallography

Scientific Union Member of the International Science Council (admitted 1947). Member of CODATA, the ISC Committee on Data. Partner with UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in the International Year of Crystallography 2014.

International Science Council Scientific Freedom Policy

The IUCr observes the basic policy of non-discrimination and affirms the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as ethnic origin, religion, citizenship, language, political stance, gender, sex or age, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science.