[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ddlm-group] Proposal to allow SU corresponding to a givenMeasurand data name to be linked using _name.linked_item_id

  • To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
  • Subject: [ddlm-group] Proposal to allow SU corresponding to a givenMeasurand data name to be linked using _name.linked_item_id
  • From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:39:08 +1000
  • DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;bh=jYQzag6fn9eFq31ig0ttvwNOohMvOQDAIMeh0g8ntG0=;b=t30kkgu+8yz9ZPzrt+Bf/RVjPnolq9cp5iJzjtLFGz9zglzAuGyC5ElhV948bczkgZHnGUTz8QGYgo9dfFFq3+yS1E0bZEVzWMgXaKxpZERTEli4qhjCWX/YDhV46UpKJP4m0pkIP2toIJj1bTS43o9S2hO8Jsq/yMLmAWY2DFYC/JgwVJFv4Uu7urEdxU6D8Esl0dpsm5Ny7ej4ZKEHlMRt63ASTMvbR+0iChI2lIKvQbtrVSn+Y04ZQSkMMZyzHEGFKwKs6qNuaFxgeQUj8s//NrBOyCS9i5Ny1Wn+vtV+RD64Oe6uCGFVpYkc0UZZFAFMfKZoYBTs9NTdEPALqQ==
Dear DDLm group,

(abbreviated text of issue raised at https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/issues/86)

The current DDLm specification provides for a data name that contains the standard uncertainty of another data name to flag this relationship by setting _type.purpose to SU and _name.linked_item_id to the data name that it holds the SU of. However, it is more often useful to search in the opposite direction, that is, given a data name, find the data name that holds the SU. I therefore propose that, when a data name has _type.purpose of Measurand, a data name specified in _name.linked_item_id will hold the standard uncertainty.  Any objections?


T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
ddlm-group mailing list

Reply to: [list | sender only]