[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reply to: [list | sender only]
[ddlm-group] Removing separate "Count" and "Index" types from_type.contents in DDLm
- To: ddlm-group <ddlm-group@iucr.org>
- Subject: [ddlm-group] Removing separate "Count" and "Index" types from_type.contents in DDLm
- From: James Hester <jamesrhester@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:31:43 +1000
Dear DDLm experts,
A suggestion has been made (see https://github.com/COMCIFS/cif_core/issues/140) that we do not need all of "Count", "Index" and "Integer" types in the list of possible values for _type.contents. "Count" is an unsigned integer, "Index" is a non-zero unsigned integer, and "Integer" is ... an integer. We have _enumeration.range which allows us to specify the lower limit of a value, and so "Integer" in combination with this is sufficient to exactly cover both "Count" and "Index". Does anybody see a problem with removing "Count" and "Index"?
thanks,
James.
--
--
T +61 (02) 9717 9907
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
F +61 (02) 9717 3145
M +61 (04) 0249 4148
_______________________________________________ ddlm-group mailing list ddlm-group@iucr.org http://mailman.iucr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddlm-group
Reply to: [list | sender only]
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ddlm-group] Removing separate "Count" and "Index" types from_type.contents in DDLm (Herbert J. Bernstein)
- Prev by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Improving the enumeration_range definition.
- Next by Date: Re: [ddlm-group] Removing separate "Count" and "Index" types from_type.contents in DDLm
- Prev by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Handling of missing and null in dREL
- Next by thread: Re: [ddlm-group] Removing separate "Count" and "Index" types from_type.contents in DDLm
- Index(es):