[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Request for comment (Cracow100

• To: Multiple recipients of list <ecacomsig@iucr.org>
• Subject: Re: Request for comment (Cracow100
• From: "L. Cranswick" <L.M.D.Cranswick@dl.ac.uk>
• Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 15:49:16 GMT

Forwarded on behalf of Sasha (sacha@lcm3b.uhp-nancy.fr) due to 
 "From:" listserv nuances.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear All,

Davide Viterbo :
>1 -  I agree with Tassos comment about the 'New' Structural Problems.

OK, I still believe that if we look larger we do see NEW problems (and I
hope WILL SEE more), some example were given yesterday in my previous mail.
Many of these problems "were in the air" for some time (in that sense they
are not new) but NOW they became REAL problem we should attack practically.
        Nevertheless, if this title seems to be too much provocative, "New
algorithms for difficult crystallographic problems" may be better.
        I still believe that we should NOT add in the title neither
"macromolecular" nor "structural" to leave it open for all aspects of
crystallography.

I agree with all others suggestions by Davide.

Best regards,

Sasha

Reply to: [list | sender only]

• Prev by Date: Re: Request for comment (Cracow1001)
• Next by Date: Re: Request for comment (Cracow1001)
• Prev by thread: Proposed Cracow2001/COMSIG sessions (update)
• Next by thread: Request for comment (Cracow1001)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread